Trump administration’s new food stamp rules will make it harder for Kentuckians to get aid
By early afternoon, every other Friday, a line forms outside the public library in Paducah for the 4 p.m. free meals a local charity hands out.
Many are the working poor, showing up in uniforms from cleaning services, fast food restaurants or other low-wage jobs, said Bryant Hileman, executive director of Project Pomona, a volunteer group he organized to feed the hungry in McCracken County.
With so many people already struggling, Hileman said he can’t understand why the Trump administration announced Wednesday it will tighten rules that already require some “able-bodied” adults who get food stamps to report work hours of at least 20 hours a week or lose their benefits.
It’s a move projected to kick about 700,000 people off the program nationwide.
“I think it’s totally the wrong direction,” Hileman said. “The logic is, ‘We’re going to punish the poor because we know what’s better for them.’ That hasn’t gotten us very far.”
The new rule will have little immediate impact in Kentucky, where more than 25,000 adults without dependents already have lost food stamps since 2018 under existing work rules enforced by the administration of Gov. Matt Bevin, according to the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy.
Previously, most Kentucky counties had been exempt from existing federal requirements under “waivers” allowed in areas affected by economic hardship. But the Bevin administration allowed those waivers to expire, making almost all Kentucky counties subject to current work reporting rules, said Dustin Pugel, a policy analyst with the progressive research center based in Berea.
“This rule doesn’t have any meaningful effect on folks now,” Pugel said. “We’d already let all those waivers expire.”
Only eight Eastern Kentucky counties are still exempt because they are part of a federal pilot program. But their waivers expire Jan. 1.
The new rule was announced Wednesday by U.S. Agriculture Department Secretary Sonny Perdue, whose agency oversees the nation’s $60 billion Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, previously known as food stamps.
Perdue said the change, which takes effect in April, is meant to make people more self-sufficient at a time when the economy is strong and unemployment is low.
“We need everyone who can work, to work,” he said, according to a USDA press release.
The rule applies to adults ages 18-49 without dependents who are deemed able to work.
But Pugel said research shows most adults who get food stamps and are able to work do so, but can’t always get regular hours to meet the 20-hour a week requirement or have seasonal jobs with hours that fluctuate. Furthermore, he said, some have difficulty reporting their hours or may not understand the requirement.
“Mandating that someone report a certain number of hours doesn’t work,” he said.
The new rule makes it much harder for states to get waivers from the existing work rules. That makes it is unlikely Gov.-elect Andy Beshear could get relief in the future for Kentucky counties should the state’s economy falter and the need for food stamps increase, Pugel said.
“In the short term, I don’t think it means a whole lot,” Pugel said. “But it’s a really sweeping rule that ties the state’s hands from being able to help folks get food assistance during a downturn or in an economically distressed area.”
Under the existing rule, 114 of 120 Kentucky counties would be eligible for a waiver from reporting work hours, should the state seek one, he said. Under the new rule, only around 30 counties would qualify, Pugel said.
Currently, about 507,000 Kentuckians get help buying food through the federal program — including 258,000 children, 63,000 people over age 60 and 317,000 people ages 18-59, according to the center.
About 51,000 are adults without disabilities or dependent children who are subject to reporting work hours to keep SNAP benefits, the center found in a report in April.
The average SNAP payment per U.S. household is about $254 per month, according to a November report by the Urban Institute. In Kentucky, Pugel said, that averages out to $1.32 per meal.
The program, funded entirely by the federal government, also puts money into the economy.
James Ziliak, director of the Center for Poverty Research at the University of Kentucky, told a legislative task force earlier this year that in the 2018 fiscal year, Kentuckians received more than $850 million in SNAP benefits. Every dollar of a SNAP benefit generates $1.50 of economic activity, or nearly $1.3 billion in 2018, Ziliak said.
The money goes to about 4,500 grocery stores in Kentucky, ranging from “major supermarkets to mom-and-pop convenience stores,” he said.
In an op-ed piece published this week in the Arizona Daily Star, Perdue, the USDA chief, said the changes would “restore the dignity of work to a sizable segment of our population, while also respecting the taxpayers who fund the program.”
But Pugel and other advocates argue the Trump administration is attempting to do by regulation what Congress has refused to do in previous years when such changes were proposed for the federal Farm Bill, which includes the SNAP program.
The new rule was immediately denounced by advocates for the poor nationally and in Kentucky.
Read this: Kentucky benefits task force makes only minor recommendations
The Rev. Kent Gilbert, president of the Kentucky Council of Churches, objected to Perdue’s claim the changes would help people find “the dignity of work.”
“I think that statement makes rich people with jobs feel better,” Gilbert said.”I think the idea of cutting them back and saying this is so you will have dignity is a ridiculous premise. I think it’s as cynical and mean-spirited and anti-Christian as it can possibly be.”
In Paducah, Hileman said his volunteer organization remains committed to trying to provide food to the hungry without questioning them about their income or work status. Hileman runs the nonprofit out of his home, working nights and weekends after his job.
“We really do believe food is a human right,” he said. “I work full time and as a private citizen, hand out hundreds of meals. I shouldn’t have to do that in this country.”
By Deborah Yetter
Louisville Courier Journal
It’s not the working poor who are affected , it’s the “able bodied” people who are sitting on their back sides not working, but drawing benefits earned by the ones who are working and paying taxes. If you’re able to work you should be earning your food just like everyone else.
Levisa Lazer,
I am appalled you published this trash of an article. Completely misleading title, loaded with contradictions, and written very poorly.
It’s not making it harder on kentuckians who need help. It’s lowering the tax burden on normal working class Americans currently paying 60 billion dollars a year for able bodied adults who aren’t working and are selling them for drugs. This rule only affects those without children, single, and able bodied. Are you kidding me with this trash? Respond please.
Well you are wrong on the amount of money it will save an estimate of $5.5 billion over 5 years while on the other hand Trump has so far this year gave $16 billion to bail out the farmers on something of his own doing.
I remember when lil Bush and Obama bailed out the auto industry and the Hooplheads went crazy and it cost less than half of what he has gave the farmers.
And let’s not forget about the deficit for the last fiscal year we had to borrow $989 billion dollars for the first month of this fiscal year $162 billion. What has happened to the so called conservatives?
KAG,
I never said how much it would save so I don’t see how it was wrong. I said we currently pay 60 billion annually. I didn’t save we’d save that much. If you’re going to participate in this debate, actually read the post correctly.
you did say they are giving them 60 billion a year which is not true I really don’t care about the food stamp new rule if you are able to work WORK but to come out and say we are taking people off of food stamps and on the other hand we are bailing the farmer’s out and spending 3 times more money on something of his own doing is hypocritical but the Hoopleheads like the sound of this just like Mexico is going to pay for the wall and you didn’t mention anything about the deficit so I guess it doesn’t bother you as long as there is a Republican in office
KAG,
You’re trying to conflate separate issues because of your lack of understanding of the currently discussed issue.
I pulled 60 billion from the article. The program itself is 60 billion annually. Just because I called you out and you got butthurt, doesn’t make me wrong. It makes you wrong. Read the article, develop an understanding, and then you might be in my level.
you come out and say the government spends 60 billion on SNAP but it sounds like Trump’s new rule will save $60 billion when in fact that’s not what it does
this confuses all the Hoopleheads but if you look at the ones getting the food stamps are more than likely they voted for Trump then he bails out the farmers on something he does and it costs 3 times more
another example he donates his salary to charity but on the other hand it has cost the tax payers about $114,000,000 dollars to play golf and visit his resorts and by the way his resorts get all the money
https://trumpgolfcount.com/
“I’m going to be working for you. I’m not going to have time to go play golf.” –Donald J. Trump, August, 2016
again nothing about the deficit when a republican is in charge
KAG,
I like how you tried to hide the fact that you were wrong buried under a mountain of useless information. “People on food stamps are more likely voting for trump” where are you getting this information.. that is completely untrue. There is a reason democrats offer free stuff every chance they get.
Further, I also happen to detest the golf playing. I think Obama also played golf and I thought that was ridiculous as well. However, to say that trump giving up his salary isn’t a good thing is ridiculous, as no other president has done this.
Lastly, there are numerous reasons long term for the tariffs. Including recent wins in trade deals with multiple nations. I am also not a fan of deficit increases, Although one could also argue the trump administration has created almost 7 trillion dollars added to the stock market which is also good long term
G.W. — This article came from The Louisville Courier-Journal. We do not agree or disagree with the contents but believe it is of value to our viewers. –Editor
If you can work then you should HAVE to WORK. Government assistance is much needed sometimes, but able bodied people abuse these programs on a daily basis. Get a damn job, quit abusing the system.